Diana F+ or LC-A+?

I have always been amazed on how people capture photographs, from moving images making it to still images. I like the fact that it preserves events through a lifetime, whether it's happy or sad, or whatever emotion it is. I like the fact that it makes memories...that photographs are memories that you can hold from your hands.

Due to the hype of digital cameras(i love digital photography as well), and overusing of it, I was able to look on the different side of photography. Nothing so serious, but I do like to try and do it. I've been into Lomography from the first time I heard about it, I fancy looking at it every now and then, but I have always been intimidated by all these technical terms and manual settings and all...which I think digital cameras snatch from me. :) And now I met someone who gave me little advice about it, gave me more enthusiasm in it, and gave me reason to start off...and I might just start shooting for real...though bit by bit, and though for fun only.

Ever since, I'm torn between these two...

Lomo LC-A+ which uses 35mm film, which is better 'cause it has like 24/36 shots...but it's more expensive than...
Diana F+ which uses 120mm film, which is around 12 shots only. But, have told that there's a way that I can use 35mm for Diana, plus what I love about this is that you can change the lenses.

Now...with which one do you think is better to start off Lomography? :)